Advertisements
Cross Section to See Height Map
The white line in the bottom image is the cross section that we are looking at in the top half.
This first image shows the pebbles with very small gradients.
This second image shows the pebbles with very small larger gradients, and clipping at the highest pebble.
Some Sample Images
Using different colour splines
A simple image with its segmentation. The borders are wrapping around, as can be seen by the same colour segments on the left and right sides of the image
Some more complicated images with their segmentation
Diffuse lighting, 200 pebbles
Some results from this input image
Here is what the segmented regions look like
So far, only the diffuse lighting is rendered on the pebbles. Here are some different results, each with slightly different settings. The input image is 400px by 400px. The x and y positions of the light are in the middle of the image, and the light is getting further away from the image in each picture. There are 200 segments in this image. Processing time was around 10 mins.
Dist between pixels; 1 unit
Light’s height; 1000 units
Dist between pixels; 5 unit
Light’s height; 5000 units
Dist between pixels; 10 unit
Light’s height; 10000 units
Dist between pixels; 15 unit
Light’s height; 15000 units
Dist between pixels; 20 unit
Light’s height; 20000 units
As you can see, there is a lot of clipping in the final images, and the boundaries of the regions do not have a proper gradient.
This final image was an early render of the diffuse lighting. It has many artifacting issues, and since the shapes are larger and longer, it has odd gradients that make it look like a height map of mountains rather than pebbles.
Multiple fields from an input image
Pebbles working, not on all cases
Here is a picture of the pebbles created, along with the original image, the eroded image and a sample field of one of the regions. At the moment, not all regions will work, there are problems when a region is too small or is eroded to nothing.
Problems with offset
Using a point as the interior contour is problematic for some irregularly shaped segments. Since the point is simply the average of all of the points that make up the boundary, the output will be biased towards it. This can be seen in the output of the previous post.
This can be solved by using an offset of the boundary, as can be seen here with the blue and red lines. Ehren has a function to take care of this, however it cannot offset it very far.
A solution to this is to use morphological erosion. The technique includes going around the boundary pixel by pixel and removing any parts of the region that are within a certain distance of this boundary pixel. The outcome will look like this;
With this technique, we are able to erode to any size we want, by just changing a single number. The above example is a 4px erosion, whereas the bottom example is a 20px erosion.
